1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Percentage of cases over- and understageda
Reader A Reader B Standard Neck CT Larynx Protocol Standard Neck CT Larynx Protocol Overstage (total), n = 27 0.30 (8) 0.33 (9) 0.07 (2) 0.04 (1) Understage (total), n = 27 0.07 (2) 0.07 (2) 0.33 (9) 0.48 (13)
a The number of over- and understaged cases are expressed here as a fraction of the total number of cases for each reader. Reader A tends to overstage and reader B tends to understage cancer, regardless of imaging technique.