1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1nareshArray
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

Table 3: 
The correlation between pedicle involvement in osteoporotic fractures and CT findings
CT Findings Pedicle Involvement on MR Imaging
Positive (n = 144) Negative (n = 81)
No findings (n = 111) 44 67
Sclerosis (n = 69) 55 14
Fracture (n = 45) 45 0
CT Findings	Pedicle Involvement on MR Imaging
CT Findings	Positive (n = 144)	Negative (n = 81)
No findings (n = 111)	44	67
Sclerosis (n = 69)	55	14
Fracture (n = 45)	45	0