1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 7:Anatomic outcome in the largest series dealing with the endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
Complete Occlusion Neck Remnant Aneurysm Remnant No. % No. % No. % Vinuela al (1997)11 192 53.0 148 40.9 22 6.1 Byrne et al (1999)8 165 63.7 89 34.4 5 1.9 Molyneux et al (2005)1 584 66.3 228 25.9 69 7.8 Gallas et al (2005)5 496 72.6 171 25.0 16 2.4 Present series 366 47.3 324 41.9 83 10.7