1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1nareshArray
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

Table 2: Anatomic results (Montreal Scale, reviewers) in relation to the treatment technique^a
Coiling Remodeling
No. % No. %
Complete occlusion 282 46.9 79 50.0
Neck remnant 250 41.6 71 44.9
Aneurysm remnant 69 11.5 8 5.1
Total 601 100.0 158 100.0
a The 14 patients treated by stenting were excluded from analysis. P = .059.
	Coiling		Remodeling
	No.	%	No.	%
Complete occlusion	282	46.9	79	50.0
Neck remnant	250	41.6	71	44.9
Aneurysm remnant	69	11.5	8	5.1
Total	601	100.0	158	100.0