1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1nareshArray
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

Table 7: Observer 2 quality image evaluation for each patient by comparing various reconstruction methods
Image Quality Total Score
Poor Fair Good Excellent
MPR 5 33 37 10 137
CPR 1 15 48 21 174
MIP 3 24 46 12 152
VR 0 13 52 20 177

Note:—Poor = 0, fair = 1, good = 2, and excellent = 3.
	Image Quality				Total Score
	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent	Total Score
MPR	5	33	37	10	137
CPR	1	15	48	21	174
MIP	3	24	46	12	152
VR	0	13	52	20	177