1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Radiation-reduction techniques (in grays)a
Mean % Reduction Minimum Maximum Unmodified 12.8 ± 7.7 2.4 36.1 Fixed replacing portable CT 12.5 ± 7.5 2.3 2.2 35.3 Low-dose portable CT 12.6 ± 7.5 1.9 2.2 35.5 CTA replacing DSA 12.2 ± 7.6 4.9 0.3 35.5 MRI replacing CT 12.0 ± 7.3 6.6 0.3 34.2 Lower fluoroscopy rate 11.3 ± 6.8 11.6 2.4 32.7 3.6–2.7 μGy per frame 11.0 ± 6.5 13.8 2.4 31.1 3.6–1.8 μGy per frame 9.1 ± 5.3 29.1 2.3 26.7 All above 6.4 ± 4.0 56.6 0.0 18.7
a Calculated dose based on individual specific modifications of imaging techniques as described in the text. Dose was calculated for each patient and individual study and reported for the collective group.