1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1nareshArray
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

Table 5: 
Optimum threshold, sensitivity, and specificity of each histogram parameter for distinguishing SMT from lymphoma
SMT versus Lymphoma
HW_CEL PHP_CEL MV_CEL MV_PEL
Threshold 2.5 2.4 3.9 0.8
Sensitivity 100.0% 85.7% 100.0% 83.3%
Specificity 92.7% 83.3% 100.0% 67.7%
	SMT versus Lymphoma
	HW_CEL	PHP_CEL	MV_CEL	MV_PEL
Threshold	2.5	2.4	3.9	0.8
Sensitivity	100.0%	85.7%	100.0%	83.3%
Specificity	92.7%	83.3%	100.0%	67.7%