1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )TABLE 4:MTR histogram metrics in cervical cord tissue in healthy volunteers, patients with ADEM, and patients with MS
Finding Control Subjects Patients with ADEM Patients with MS P Value Patients with ADEM vs Patients with MS Control Subjects vs Patients with MS MTR (%) 45.7 (2.3) 43.7 (2.5) 39.2 (3.2) .005 <.001 MTR peak height 69.6 (27.7) 67.8 (10.3) 65.4 (14.9) >.05 >.05 MTR peak position (%) 40.8 (2.3) 39.0 (4.0) 34.3 (2.6) .008 <.001
Note.—Data are the means; data in parentheses are the SDs. No significant difference between control subjects and patients with ADEM was found.