1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )TABLE 5:Grading summary for all vessels examined
Grade Vascular Signal* Impact of Contrast Enhancement† Precontrast Images Postcontrast Images Postcontrast Images Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage 0 430 89.6 436 90.8 455 94.8 1 23 4.8 32 6.7 16 3.3 2 26 5.4 12 2.5 9 1.9 NR 1 0.2 0 0.0 — — Total 480 100 480 100 480 100
Note.—Data are for median grades across all five observers.
* Vascular signal grade 0 indicates normal segment or region; 1, diminished flow; 2, absent flow; and NR, not readable.
† Impact of contrast enhancement grade 0 indicates no effect; 1, adverse effect but tolerable; 2, nondiagnostic.