1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

TABLE 3:

TABLE 3: ADC changes of subcortical low-intensity lesions in 55 patients

ADC (10−3 mm2/s) of Subcortical White Matter
SCLI (+) (n = 14)SCLI (−) (n = 41)
Lesion0.68 ± 0.10*0.72 ± 0.05
Contralateral0.75 ± 0.080.73 ± 0.05
Decrease (%)9.3 ± 11.40.59 ± 7.59
P value<.00001>.05
  • Note.—SCLI (+) and SCLI (−) indicate patients with and those without, respectively, subcortical low intensity.

  • * ADC of subcortical low-intensity lesion was significantly lower than that of contralateral subcortical white matter (Student t test).

  • Percentage decrease in signal intensity of the lesion to the corresponding area in the contralateral hemisphere.