1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


TABLE 3: 
Lesion Conspicuity by Imaging Technique
Conspicuity Level and Lesion TypeT1-Weighted SEVIBEMP RAGE
Best*
 Contrast-enhancing12.5 (14/11)8 (8/8)2.5 (1/4)
 All hyperintense20.5 (23/18)10 (9/11)3.5 (2/5)
Intermediate*
 Contrast-enhancing4 (5/3)9 (10/8)10 (8/12)
 All hyperintense4.5 (5/4)15 (18/12)14.5 (11/18)
Lowest*
 Contrast-enhancing6.5 (4/9)6 (5/7)10.5 (14/7)
 All hyperintense9 (6/12)9 (7/11)16 (21/11)
Average rank†
 Contrast-enhancing1.7 (1.6/1.9)1.9 (1.9/2.0)2.4 (2.4/2.4)
 All hyperintense1.6 (1.6/1.9)2.0 (1.9/2.0)2.4 (2.6/2.2)
  • Note.—There were 34 hyperintense lesions of which 23 were contrast enhancing. Numbers in parentheses are separate results for the two readers.
  • ↵* Data are the average number of lesions.
  • ↵† Data are the average rank based on the ranking scheme 1 (best), 2 (intermediate), and 3 (worst).