1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )TABLE 1:Mean signal intensity ratios of the lesions on T2-weighted images
Group and Lesion Signal Intensity Ratio At 30 min At 2 h 1, triolein (n = 8) Type 1 (n = 7) 1.14 (0.08)* 1.41 (0.08)* Type 2 (n = 8) 1.21 (0.15) 1.36 (0.09) 2, oleic acid (n = 10) Type 1 (n = 8) 1.23 (0.10)* 1.67 (0.24)* Type 2 (n = 10) 1.15 (0.14) 1.36 (0.17)
Note.—The data are the mean ± SD.
* In type 1 lesions, the signal intensity ratios were significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1 at both 30 minutes and 2 hours (P < .013). However, in type 2 lesions, the signal intensity ratios did not significantly differ between the two groups at either time point (P > .643).