1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Mean FA of a patient with vacuolating megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy and of control subjects
Region of Interest Mean FA FA Decrease (%) VML Patient Control Subjects (n = 2) 1 0.13 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.01 7.1 2 0.16 ± 0.01 0.21 ± 0.07 23.8 3 0.26 ± 0.05 0.34 ± 0.04 23.5 4 0.34 0.40 ± 0.08 15
Note.—FA indicates fractional anisotropy; VML, vacuolating megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy; locations of regions of interest are depicted in Figure 4.