1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Statistical analysis of the diagnosis of hemorrhagic lesions with AF and PF sonography
Hemorrhage Better Approach for Diagnosis P Value, McNemar Test Kappa Index (95% CI) Grade I AF .001 0.165 (0.028, 0.301) Grade II PF .001 0.517 (0.336, 0.698) Grade III AF and PF equal >.05 0.889 (0.764, 1.013) Hemorrhagic infarction AF .034 0.647 (0.421, 0.873)