1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )TABLE 2:Analysis of MB location in the infratentorial area according to anatomic division
Direction and Comparison P Value* Pons Cerebellum Rostrocaudal Superior vs mid .07 .02 Superior vs inferior .28 <.01 Mid vs inferior .46 .08 Anteroposterior Anterior vs mid <.01 <.01 Anterior vs posterior <.01 .56 Mid vs posterior <.01 <.01 Mediolateral Medial vs median <.01 .03 Medial vs lateral <.01 <.01 Median vs lateral .02 <.01
* The Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparisons.