1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

TABLE 2:

Sensitivity of hyperattenuating MCA sign and EIS depending on vessel occlusion: blinded data set

Site of OcclusionHyperattenuating MCA SignEIS on CT ScanEIS on DW Image
ICA with MCA embolization (n = 5)3 (60)4 (80)4 (80)
ICA bifurcation (n = 6)5 (83)6 (100)6 (100)
MCA trunk (n = 12)10 (83)11 (92)12 (100)
MCA trifurcation (n = 3)02 (67)3 (100)
MCA branch (n = 17)4 (24)10 (59)16 (94)
No verified occlusion (n = 2)001 (50)
  • Note.—Data are number of patients. Numbers in parentheses are percentages.