1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Technical success
Technical Success Patients % for Patients with Data Proven % for Total 339 Patients Successful stent deployment and placement 198 93% (212) 58% Patients requiring subsequent surgical intervention 6 2% (301) 2% Raymond class I occlusion (or equivalent) 130 63% (207) 38% Raymond class II occlusion (or equivalent) 39 19% (207) 12% Raymond class III occlusion (or equivalent) 26 13% (207) 8% No occlusion 11 5% (207) 3%