1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Univariate analysis: relationship between LAD and the existence of language and motor deficits
Characteristic <1 1–2 2+ P Value SMC LAD vs motor deficits With pre- or postoperative paresis (%) 84 (CI, 66–94) 50 (CI, 28–72) 11 (CI, 1–28) <.001 Broca and/or Wernicke area LAD vs language deficits With pre- or postoperative aphasia (%) 68 (CI, 48–83) 33 (CI, 15–58) 28 (CI, 16–44) .009