1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Patients receiving more than 1 vertebroplasty and the reasons
Groups No. of Vertebroplasties Patient No. Reason Nonpreventive group 2 9 The adjacent vertebral fracture was in 1 level only or in both levels found at the same time 3 1 2 adjacent fractures occurred separately 5 1 3 adjacent fractures and 1 nonadjacent fracture occurred separately Preventive group 3 1 Fracture in the vertebra adjacent to a PrVP level and 1 nonadjacent fracture