1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 6:Interobserver agreement of ADC values regarding primary tumors and lymph nodes using EPI- and HASTE-DWI
Bias (10–5 mm2/s) LoA (10–5 mm2/s) ICC (95% CI) EPI-DWI observer 1 versus EPI-DWI observer 2 2.50 −19.75, 24.75 0.76 (0.66–0.84) HASTE-DWI observer 1 versus HASTE-DWI observer 2 −0.92 −20.91, 19.07 0.92 (0.87–0.95)
Note:—LoA indicates limits of agreement.