1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 7:Agreement of ADC values regarding primary tumors and lymph nodes between EPI- and HASTE DWI
Bias (10–5 mm2/s) LoA (10–5 mm2/s) ICC (95% CI) EPI-DWI observer 1 versus HASTE-DWI observer 1 −5.74 −49.60; 38.12 0.42 (0.22–0.60) EPI-DWI observer 2 versus HASTE-DWI observer 2 −8.62 −57.97; 40.74 0.31 (0.08–0.51)
Note:—LoA indicates limits of agreement.