1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


Table 2: 
Assessment of intersubject alignmenta
SimilarityDARTEL + LI (n = 54)DARTEL − LI (n = 54)P (DARTEL + LI vs DARTEL − LI)USM + LI (n = 54)USM − LI (n = 54)P (USM + LI vs USM − LI)
NMI1.2630 (0.0064)1.2602 (0.0063)<.00011.1998 (0.0063)1.1981 (0.0062)<.0001
CC0.9675 (0.0039)0.9669 (0.0040)<.00010.9090 (0.0106)0.9084 (0.0107)<.0001
  • 

    ↵a Values are mean (SD). Overall, DARTEL showed higher NMI and CC (P < .0001) compared with USM.