1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1nareshArray
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

Table 3: Sensitivity and specificity of final nSI of peritumoral T2 prolongation with high predictive power in differentiating GBM from solitary MET using ROC analysis
Peritumoral T2 Prolongation Grading Cutoff Value Sensitivity Specificity AUC
Grade I 2.44 0.974 0.444 0.741
Grade II 3.085 0.857 0.917 0.869
Total 2.88 0.644 0.762 0.725
Peritumoral T2 Prolongation Grading	Cutoff Value	Sensitivity	Specificity	AUC
Grade I	2.44	0.974	0.444	0.741
Grade II	3.085	0.857	0.917	0.869
Total	2.88	0.644	0.762	0.725