1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Ulcer detection by CE-MRA and TOF-MRA techniques for individual ulcers and vessels for 2 readers
Reader 1 Number (%) Reader 2 Number (%) Individual ulcer detection Both CE and TOF 45 (63) 33 (46.5) Only CE 24 (34) 29 (41) Only TOF 1 (1.5) 1 (1.5) Neither CE nor TOF 1 (1.5) 8 (11) Total (all MR sequences) 71 (100) 71 (100) Vessels detected as ulcerated Both CE and TOF 41 (73) 30 (54) Only CE 14 (25) 23 (41) Only TOF 1 (2) 1 (2) Neither CE nor TOF 0 (0) 2 (3) Total (all MR sequences) 56 (100) 56 (100)