1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Base case results
Strategies Health Care Costs Effectiveness (QALY) Difference ICERa ($/QALY) Dominance Costs Effectiveness PET + MEG $95,612 16.30 – – SPECT + MEG $95,824 16.28 $212b −0.0241b – Dominated PET + SPECT $96,532 16.36 $920b 0.0543b $16,937c Ext. Dominated SPECT $97,479 16.45 $1867b 0.1443b $12,934c MEG $97,499 16.42 $21 −0.0238d – Dominated PET $97,623 16.44 $144 −0.0121d – Dominated
Note:— – indicates XXX; Ext., extended.
↵a The results of incremental effectiveness and ICER may not show as the calculated value based on the “Effectiveness” column due to round-up.
↵b The result of incremental cost and incremental effectiveness was compared with strategy 1—PET+MEG.
↵c The ICER was calculated when the strategies were compared with strategy 1—PET+MEG.
↵d The results of incremental effectiveness were compared with strategy 4—SPECT.