1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Comparison of myelographic appearance of spinal meningeal diverticula
Control SIH P Valuea Morphology Round (No.) (%) 20 (51) 62 (52) .946 Multilobulated (No.) (%) 19 (49) 57 (48) Size 0–3 mm (No.) (%) 9 (23) 22 (18) .711 4–6 mm (No.) (%) 23 (59) 71 (60) >6 mm (No.) (%) 7 (18) 26 (22) Location Cervical (No.) (%) 2 (5) 4 (3) 0.050 Upper thoracic (No.) (%) 6 (15) 33 (28) Lower thoracic (No.) (%) 29 (75) 65 (55) Lumbar (No.) (%) 2 (5) 17 (14)
↵a P value based on the generalized estimating equations test of the difference between groups in proportions in morphologic categories while accounting for multiple observations per patient.