1naresh
Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
1nareshArray
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
Table 1: Grading of facet joint inflammation using fat-saturated MRI signal characteristicsa
Grade 0 No signal abnormality 1 Signal abnormality limited to joint capsule 2 Periarticular signal abnormality involving <50% of the facet joint perimeterb 3 Periarticular signal abnormality involving >50% of the facet joint perimeter 4 Grade 3 with additional signal abnormality within the neural foramen, pedicle, ligamentum flavum, transverse process, or vertebral bodyc
↵a Grading scale adapted from Czervionke and Fenton.6
↵b Periarticular signal abnormality includes T2 hyperintensity or gadolinium enhancement on T1-weighted images.
↵c Signal abnormality within the pedicle must be continuous with other perifacet signal abnormalities and cannot represent posterior extension of vertebral body edema.