1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Comparisons of artifacts limiting arterial evaluation with 256-section and 64-section CTA of the carotids
Shoulder streak artifacts Photon starvation between shoulders obscures CCA, vertebral artery, IJV in lower neck 12 14 0.820 Metallic streak artifacts Dental hardware, cardiac defibrillator leads, spinal fusion hardware, etc, obscure adjacent structures 22 37 0.004 Contrast material reflux Contrast reflux into veins of neck obscures adjacent vertebral artery 0 0 N/A Flow artifacts Altered flow dynamics (eg, slow flow) and rapid scanning time create appearance of dissection flap or nonopacification of patent vessel Arterial Pseudodissection 1 1 1.000 Pseudo-occlusion 0 1 N/A Differential attenuation 5 1 0.204 Venous Pseudothrombosis 0 0 N/A