1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Effect of WM injury or intraventricular hemorrhage on deep GM or cerebellum in VPT infants
Deep GM Cerebellum Signal Abnormality n (%) Corrected Deep GM Area Mean (SD) Signal Abnormality n (%) Corrected Transcerebellar Diameter Mean (SD) WM injuryc Yes (n = 23) 4 (17)a 9.4 (1.2)b 7 (30) 49.0 (2.8) No (n = 74) 1 (1.4) 9.9 (0.9) 16 (22) 49.3 (3.4) Intraventricular hemorrhage Yes (n = 31) 3 (9.7) 9.4 (0.9)b 12 (39)b 48.2 (3.5)b No (n = 66) 2 (3) 9.9 (1.0) 11 (17) 49.7 (3.0)