1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Comparison of arterial damage by the device samples according to the presence or absence of a clot and the number of retrievalsa
With Clot (10 Samples) Without Clot (10 Samples) P Valueb Two Retrievals (10 Samples) Three Retrievals (10 Samples) P Valuec Mural thrombus (%) 0.5 ± 1.6 10.1 ± 19.3 .21 3.2 ± 10.3 7.3 ± 17.6 .31 Endothelial denudation (%) 81.8 ± 18.9 63.8 ± 35.8 .25 68.9 ± 28.8 76.6 ± 30.0 .41 Intimal layer edema (%) 35 ± 33.4 99.1 ± 57 .009 84.1 ± 62.8 50 ± 45.6 .24 IEL fractured (%) 10 ± 17.5 37.5 ± 61.5 .18 40 ± 61.5 7.5 ± 12.1 .27 Medial layer edema (%) 45 ± 43.8 59.1 ± 26.5 .44 56.6 ± 37 47.5 ± 36.2 .58