1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Fairness of malpractice legal process in the United States
Assessment of the Malpractice Legal Process in the United States (n = 798) n (%) General Comments About Malpractice Litigation in United States (n = 94) n (%) Heavily weighted to plaintiff 275 (34.5) It is unfair 27 (23.7) Somewhat weighted to the plaintiff 372 (46.6) Negative about lawyers in general/uniformly 23 (20) Fair 93 (11.7) We all make mistakes 15 (13) Somewhat weighted to the defendant 46 (5.8) We should punish bad experts 8 (7) Heavily weighted to the defendant 12 (1.5) We need another system/arbitration panels 12 (11) The system is good 1 (1) Tort reform is needed 8 (7)
Note:—n indicates total of respondents for each question.