1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Patient characteristics between those with an ipsilateral stenotic transverse sinus (group A) and those with a normal transverse sinus (group B)
Group A (n = 15) Group B (n = 34) Age (yr) 74.5 + 10.2 73.9 + 10.3 Sex (M/F) 12:3 31:5 Hypertension 5 (33%) 13 (38%) MR imaging evidence of prior stroke 6 (40%) 16 (47%) Stenosis degree 82% 81% Lack of collaterals in MRA 2 (13%) 6 (18%)