1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Overestimation of luminal stenosis of the reconstructed parent artery with the PED
Technique Mean (mm) (%) SD (%) 95% CI of Mean 3D-TOF MRA versus DSA 1.992 (71.8) 0.998 (52.7) 0.036–3.948 (31.6%–175%) CE-TR MRA versus DSA 0.965 (26.6) 0.497 (12.7) 0.01–1.941 (1.7%–51.5%) 3D-TOF MRA versus CE-TR MRA 1.027 (50.1) 0.776 (58.8) 0.495–2.55 (65.1%–165%)