1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1naresh
Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)


Table 3: 
Aneurysm characteristics among patients who either presented with a visual disturbance or developed one after treatmenta
VariableImproved (n = 15)Not Improved or Worse (n = 8)P Value
Aneurysm size7.7 ± 5.211.9 ± 5.1.082
Neck diameter3.2 ± 1.55.3 ± 1.6.009
Dome-to-neck ratio2.09 ± 1.12.2 ± 0.7.738
Packing attenuation28.6 ± 13.727.1 ± 10.1.773
Requiring retreatment2 (13%)4 (50%).131
  • ↵a There are 23 total patients because 1 patient developed a new visual disturbance after treatment.