1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Image-quality scores for scoring method 1 (visualization of 6 bony anatomic structures) and scoring method 2 (subjective impression of the overall quality of the study) for each imaging technique, with left and right sides combineda
Standard CT Conebeam CT Difference Score 1b Reader 1 11 ± 2.8 (3–12) 10.5 ± 3.4 (3–12) 0.5c Reader 2 11 ± 2.9 (3–12) 10.25 ± 3.5 (3–12) 0.75d Difference 0 0.25 0.5c Score 2e Reader 1 5 ± 0.45 (4–5) 4 ± 0.7 (4–5) 1d Reader 2 5 ± 0.22 (3–5) 4 ± 0.54 (3–5) 1d Difference 0 0 0