1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:Diagnostic performance of MR imaging methods and their combination
Reader and MR Imaging Method Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy Reader 1 IVIM 79.5% 92.3% 86.8% DSC + DWI 69.2% 100.0% 86.8% DSC + IVIM 89.7% 94.2% 92.3% Reader 2 IVIM 84.6% 94.2% 90.1% DSC + DWI 74.3% 100.0% 89.0% DSC + IVIM 92.3% 94.2% 93.4%