1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Clinical, angiographic, and follow-up data in 28 patients with 28 large or giant ICA aneurysms
Treatment Treatment strategy FD alone 10 FD + loose coiling 18 No. implanted flow diverters Two overlapping flow diverters 5 Single flow diverter 23 Technique adverse event Poor midstent opening 1 Immediate angiographic results Partial occlusion 16 Neck remnant 2 Disrupted inflow jet and slow flow 9 Flow reduction 7 No change 3 Clinical symptoms Resolved 13 Improved 6 No change 4 Transient worsening 5 Overall procedure-related morbidity/mortality 0/0 Follow-up angiographic results (n = 25) Complete occlusion 18 (72%) Improvement 6 (24%) Stable 1 (4%)