1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 5:Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of USFNA and USCNB in salivary gland tumors according to operator experience levela
Diagnostic Values FNA (%) CNB (%) P Value Sensitivity Faculty 79 (15/19) 89 (32/36) .426 Trainee 50 (1/2) 100 (20/20) .091 Specificity Faculty 97 (57/59) 99 (96/97) .557 Trainee 93 (14/15) 100 (77/77) .163 Accuracy Faculty 92 (72/78) 96 (128/133) .336 Trainee 88 (15/17) 100 (97/97) .021b