1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 1:Pearson (r) and Spearman (ρ) correlations between rCBV metrics under PLD-corrected and non-PLD-corrected conditions, as measured by IBN and NICE perfusion software algorithmsa
rCBV Metric Non-PLD vs PLD (IBN) P Value Non-PLD vs PLD (NICE) with gvf P Value Non-PLD vs PLD (NICE) without gvf P Value Mean r = 0.87 <.001 r = 0.11 .54 r = 0.43 .01 ρ = 0.86 <.001 ρ = 0.42 .02 ρ = 0.62 <.001 Mode r = 0.78 <.001 r = 0.44 .01 r = 0.51 .01 ρ = 0.76 <.001 ρ = 0.65 <.001 ρ = 0.65 <.001 % < 1.75 r = 0.93 <.001 r = 0.55 <.001 r = 0.59 <.001 ρ = 0.91 <.001 ρ = 0.61 <.001 ρ = 0.60 <.001 FTB r = 0.96 <.001 r = 0.79 <.001 r = 0.70 <.001 ρ = 0.94 <.001 ρ = 0.72 <.001 ρ = 0.71 <.001
Note:—gvf indicates γ variate fitting.
↵a NICE calculations were performed with and without gvf. IBN modeling shows substantially higher correlation between PLD and non-PLD metrics (compared with NICE), suggesting higher rCBV accuracy in the absence of PLD correction. Statistical significance is P value < .05.