1naresh
Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
1nareshArray
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
Table 4: One-way sensitivity analysis results: probability of cataracta
Probability of Cataract Strategy Cost ($) Effectiveness (QALYs) Incremental Cost ($) Incremental Effectiveness (QALYs) Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio ($/QALY) 0 CTAP 147,110 13.81 0 0 0 TCD 154,719 13.62 7608.40 −0.20 Dominated 0.2 CTAP 147,625 13.80 0 0 0.2 TCD 154,719 13.62 7094.12 −0.18 Dominated 0.4 CTAP 148,139 13.78 0 0 0.4 TCD 154,719 13.62 6579.84 −0.17 Dominated 0.6 CTAP 148,653 13.77 0 0 0.6 TCD 154,719 13.62 6065.56 −0.15 Dominated 0.8 CTAP 149,168 13.75 0 0 0.8 TCD 154,719 13.62 5551.28 −0.13 Dominated 1 CTAP 149,682 13.73 0 0 1 TCD 154,719 13.62 5037.00 −0.12 Dominated
↵a In a 1-way sensitivity analysis, CTAP remained the optimal strategy when varying the probability of cataract from 0.0 to 1.0.