1naresh
Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
1nareshArray
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
Table 2: Clinical and anatomic results of the stent deployment in small intracranial vessels in previous studies
Series, yr Sample Size (no.) Vessel Diameter (mm) Stent Technical Success Rate (%) Complication (%) Near or Complete Occlution Rate (%) Follow-Up (%) Thromboembolic Hemorrhagic Recurrence Rate In-Stent Stenosis Turk et al, 20079 8 1.5 NF 100 25 0 100 0 N/A Siddiqui et al, 20098 8 1.58 EP 100 12.5 0 100 25 12.5 Yun and Cho, 20107 11 1.6 NF 100 0 0 100 0 9.1 Zhang et al, 20106 12 1.8 NF, LEO, WP 100 8.3 0 91.6 NA N/A Chung et al, 20155 31 1.6 EP 100 9.7 0 96.3 0 11.1 Kühn et al, 20164 44 1.7 NF, EP 93.2 13.6 2.3 88.6 9.1 6.1 Aydin et al, 201511 80 2.35 LEO Baby 97.5 7.5 1.3 96.3 6.5 15.6 Alghamdi et al, 201610 43 2.2 LVIS Jr 100 10 5 95.3 5 17.5 Puri et al, 20163 7 1.9 PED 100 0 0 N/A 0 28
Note:—N/A indicates not available; NF, Neuroform stent; EP, Enterprise stent; WP, Wingspan stent; PED, Pipeline Embolization Device.