1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Attachment site of tract: MRI and operative findingsa
Tract Attachment Site LDM (n = 12) CDS (n = 10) P Value MRI OP MRI OP Intrathecalb Conus medullaris 12 (100%) 12 (100%) 2 (20%) 3 (30%) .004 Filum terminale/nerve root – – 2 (20%) 2 (20%) Dermoid/epidermoid tumor – – – 4 (40%) Not availablec 5 (50%) No extension into the spinal canal – – 1 (10%) 1 (10%)
Note:—Op indicates operative findings.
↵a Data are number of patients, with percentages in parentheses.
↵b Because the tract of 1 patient with CDS was revealed to end in the dura mater at the operation and there was no tract in the intrathecal area, only 9 CDS tracts were assessed with regard to visibility and attachment site in its intrathecal portion.
↵c The attachment sites of the tracts could not be evaluated on MRI.