1naresh
Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
1nareshArray
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
Table 2: Visibility of tract: MRI and operative findingsa
Tract Visibility LDM (n = 12) CDS (n = 10) P Value Subcutaneous 12 (100%) 10 (100%) – Intrathecalb Entirely visible 10 (83%) 1 (10%) .003 Partially visible 2 (17%) 4 (40%) Poorly visible 0 (0%) 4 (40%)
↵a Data are number of patients, with percentages in parentheses.
↵b Because the tract of 1 patient with CDS was revealed to end in the dura mater at the operation and there was no tract in the intrathecal area, only 9 CDS tracts were assessed with regard to visibility and attachment site in its intrathecal portion.