1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Percentage changes of MVF, AVF, and g-ratio in plaques and PWM relative to NAWM
MVF (%)a AVF (%)a G-Ratio (%)a Plaques 80.78 ± 15.27 27.18 ± 25.27 23.81 ± 11.52 PWM 16.19 ± 14.82 9.31 ± 22.05 2.17 ± 8.24
↵a Values are mean ± SD. P < .001 for percentage changes of plaques and PWM relative to NAWM for comparisons among all metrics, except P = .016 for percentage change of plaques relative to NAWM when comparing between AVF and g-ratio, and P = .033 for percentage change of PWM relative to NAWM when comparing between MVF and AVF.