1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Efficacy of ethanol ablation according to the number of treatment sessionsa
No. of Sessions Single Session (n = 9) Multiple Sessions (n = 11) P Value Initial volume 21.3 ± 15.8 30.6 ± 15.3 .160 Symptom score 8.1 ± 2.2 10.0 ± 0.0 .011 Cosmetic score 3.9 (3–4) 4.0 (4) .710 Final volume (VRR) 1.3 ± 1.3 1.1 ± 1.1 .487 P value .028 .018 Symptomatic score 0.4 (0–1) 0.5 (0–2) .809 P value .017 .004 Cosmetic score 1.2 (1–2) 1.2 (1–2) .827 P value .009 .003
Note:—VRR indicates volume reduction rate.
↵a Data are means unless otherwise indicated. Range is shown in parentheses.