1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 4:MRI features among telomere maintenance glioblastoma subtypes
MRI Feature Telomere Maintenance Subtype ALT+/M− ALT−/M− ALT−/M+ Pearson χ2 and P Valuesa ALT+/M+ No. of patients 26 92 56 6 Regular margin, % (no.) 58 (15) 30 (28) 30 (17) 7.3, .026 33 (2) Fungating margin, % (no.) 19 (5) 53 (49) 61 (34) 12.8, .002 67 (4) Cystic component, % (no.) 39 (10) 24 (22) 11 (6) 8.5, .014 50 (3) Radiologic necrosis, % (no.) 58 (15) 73 (67) 86 (48) 7.7, .021 83 (5) Extensive PTE, % (no.) 23 (6) 23 (21) 45 (25) 8.6, .014 17 (1) Multifocal lesion, % (no.) 15 (4) 12 (11) 23 (13) NS 33 (2) Hemorrhage, % (no.) 8 (2) 20 (18) 7 (4) NS 3 (2)
Note:—NS indicates not significant.
↵a Statistical comparisons were made between 3 groups: ALT+/M−, ALT−/M−, and ALT−/M+.