1naresh
Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
1nareshArray
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
[type] => guest
[service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
[access-type] => Controlled
[privilege] => Array
(
[urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
(
[runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
[type] => privilege-set
[privilege-set] => GUEST
)
)
[credentials] => Array
(
[method] => guest
)
)
)
Table 6: Concordances of raters' coassessment between HRCT and O-arm—extracochlear electrode number and scalar position
No. of Extracochlear Electrodes HRCT vs O-Arm Scalar Position at 180° HRCT vs O-Arm Scalar Position at 360°a HRCT vs O-Arm Same ±1 Same Different Same Different Cochlear (n = 11) 10 (91%) 1 (9%) 8 (73%) 3 (27%) 6/9 (67%) 3/9 (33%) MED-EL (n = 3) 3 (100%) 3 (100%) 3/3 (100%) Total (n = 14) 13 (93%) 1 (7%) 11 (79%) 3 (21%) 9/12 (75%) 3/12 (25%)
↵a Some electrode arrays did not pass 360° depth, so the number of measurable cases at 360° was less than at 180°. The number of cases is indicated.