1naresh

Array
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)
1nareshArray
(
    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array
        (
            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity
            [type] => guest
            [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org
            [access-type] => Controlled
            [privilege] => Array
                (
                    [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array
                        (
                            [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege
                            [type] => privilege-set
                            [privilege-set] => GUEST
                        )

                )

            [credentials] => Array
                (
                    [method] => guest
                )

        )

)

Table 1: Referring provider survey on contextual structured reporting (n = 85)^{^a}
Question Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree
Do you have a positive overall impression of the new disease-specific structured radiology reports as they pertain to your specialty? 64 (75) 15 (18) 4 (5) 2 (2) 0 (0)
On average, it is easy for me to understand the pertinent findings from the structured radiology reports 58 (68) 23 (27) 3 (4) 1 (1) 0 (0)
On average, it is easy for me to understand the main impression from the structured radiology reports 55 (65) 26 (31) 3 (4) 1 (1) 0 (0)
Do you prefer structured radiology reporting to the previous prose, narrative reporting style you are accustomed to? 52 (61) 19 (22) 13 (15) 1 (1) 0 (0)
↵a Thirty-eight neurologists, 34 otolaryngologists, 10 radiation oncologists, and 3 neurosurgeons. Data are number (percentage).