1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 3:Correlations between diagnosis lag time and region-specific brain damage in neurologic WDa
Time Lag to Diagnosis No. of Cases Putamen Pallidum Caudate Nucleus Thalamus Midbrain Pons Cerebellum Frontal Lobe Temporal Lobe Parietal Lobe Corpus Callosum ≤3 mo 32 29 (90.6) 3 (9.4) 11 (34.4) 8 (25) 3 (9.4) 4–6 mo 42 37 (88.1) 8 (19.0) 5 (11.9) 12 (28.6) 9 (21.4) 10 (23.8) 1 (2.4) 2 (4.8) 1 (2.4) 5 (11.9) 7–12 mo 76 69 (90.8) 14 (18.4) 31 (40.8) 17 (22.4) 20 (26.3) 28 (36.8) 2 (2.6) 2 (2.6) 2 (2.6) 1 (1.3) 1–3 yr 87 69 (79.3) 5 (5.7) 13 (14.9) 24 (27.6) 19 (21.8) 37 (42.5) 5 (5.7) 5 (5.7) 5 (5.7) 4 (4.6) >3 yr 127 91 (71.7) 29 (22.8) 73 (57.5) 67 (52.8) 74 (58.3) 86 (67.7) 1 (0.8) 3 (2.4) 3 (2.4) 6 (4.7)
↵a Data are number and percentage.