1naresh
Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) ) 1nareshArray ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:identity [type] => guest [service-id] => ajnr-ac.highwire.org [access-type] => Controlled [privilege] => Array ( [urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege] => Array ( [runtime-id] => urn:ac.highwire.org:guest:privilege [type] => privilege-set [privilege-set] => GUEST ) ) [credentials] => Array ( [method] => guest ) ) )Table 2:Subjective evaluation of the quality of the FPDCT angiography and perfusion
Variable No Diagnostic Quality/Severe Poor Diagnostic Quality/Substantial Fair Diagnostic Quality/Tolerable Good Diagnostic Quality/Negligible Perfect Diagnostic Quality/None FPDCT angiography/perfusion overall 0 1 3 7 4 Detection of LVO 0 0 3 5 7 Evaluation of collaterals 0 0 4 5 6 FPDCT perfusion 1 1 3 6 4 Motion artifacts 1 2 4 5 3